This sort of data transfer is not uncommon, especially for Facebook; plenty of apps use Facebook’s software development kits (SDK) as a means to implement features into their apps more easily, which also has the effect of sending information to Facebook. But Zoom users may not be aware it is happening, nor understand that when they use one product, they may be providing data to another service altogether.
Earlier today, March 16, Brave filed a formal complaint against Google with the lead General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) enforcer in Europe.
a February Cointelegraph interview, Dr. Johnny Ryan, Brave’s chief
policy and industry relations officer, explained that Google is abusing
its power by sharing user data collected by dozens of its distinct
services, creating a “free for all” data warehouse. According to Ryan,
this was a clear violation of the GDPR.
Aggravated with the situation and the lack of enforcement against the giant, Ryan promised to take Google to court if things don’t change for the better.
The database didn’t contain real names but tied anonymous whispers to “a user’s stated age, ethnicity, gender, hometown, nickname and any membership in groups, many of which are devoted to sexual confessions and discussion of sexual orientation and desires,” according to the Post. The data also reportedly included location coordinates for a person’s most recent whisper.
More than one billion Android devices around the world are
vulnerable to attack by hackers because they are no longer supported by
security updates and built-in protection, new research by Which? has
Based on Google data, two in five of Android users worldwide may no
longer be receiving updates, and while these devices won’t immediately
have problems, without security support there is an increased risk to
Speaking at the RSA security conference last week, Microsoft engineers said that 99.9% of the compromised accounts they track every month don’t use multi-factor authentication, a solution that stops most automated account attacks.
The cloud giant said it tracks more than 30 billion login events per day and more than one billion monthly active users.
Microsoft said that, on average, around 0.5% of all accounts get compromised each month, a number that in January 2020 was about 1.2 million.
While all account hacks are bad, they are worse when the account is for enterprise use. Of these highly-sensitive accounts, only 11% had a multi-factor authentication (MFA) solution enabled, as of January 2020, Microsoft said.
The Swiss government has filed a criminal complaint relating to the alleged practices of US and German intelligence agencies in spying on other governments over the course of decades.
The complaint in question is centered around Operation Rubicon, the focus of a recent investigation by the Washington Post, ZDF, and SRF into Swiss company Crypto AG.
Crypto AG is a seller of encoded and encrypted devices deemed suitable — and secure enough — for confidential government communications. It is estimated that over 100 governments worldwide have been counted as Crypto AG clients over the course of decades.
Rumors concerning the CIA and its German counterpart BND being able to crack these devices have been around for some time, and now the recent inquiry — which reveals that Crypto AG was owned by these authorities until recently — claims that the agencies deliberately introduced backdoors and weaknesses in products sold by Crypto AG to intercept and eavesdrop on users.
New academic research published last month looked at the phone-home features of six of today’s most popular browsers and found that the Brave browser sent the smallest amount of data about its users back to the browser maker’s servers.
The research, conducted by Douglas J. Leith, a professor at Trinity College at the University of Dublin, looked at Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Brave, Microsoft Edge (the new Chromium-based version), and the Yandex Browser.
Prof. Leith used a series of automated tests to measure and collect the network communications that a browser initiates to its backend infrastructure. These network communications are also known as telemetry or phoning-home.
Facebook wants you to think it’s consistently increasing transparency
about how the company stores and uses your data. But the company still
isn’t revealing everything to its users, according to an investigation by Privacy International.
obvious holes in Facebook’s privacy data exports paint a picture of a
company that aims to placate users’ concerns without actually doing
anything to change its practices.
Data lists are incomplete — The most pressing issue with Facebook’s downloadable privacy data is that it’s incomplete. Privacy International’s
investigation tested the “Ads and Business” section on Facebook’s
“Download Your Information” page, which purports to tell users which
advertisers have been targeting them with ads.
found that the list of advertisers actually changes over time, seemingly
at random. This essentially makes it impossible for users to develop a
full understanding of which advertisers are using their data. In this
sense, Facebook’s claims of transparency are inaccurate and misleading.